Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source
From: Len Rose <len () netsys com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 15:40:34 -0400
We do have a limit and then it hits the moderator queue, requiring approval. My message was not about the size ofd the file but rather about the sheer useless re-transmission of a binary (any executable) that no one in their right mind would actually run which is why I suggested that source code should be included next time. Raj Mathur wrote:
How about implementing a mail size limit too while we're about it? No reason to send mails over, say, 50K to the list -- you can always put up larger items on the web and add a URL to your mail. Heck, even a shared Yahoo folder or something would do.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Len Rose (Aug 18)
- Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Raj Mathur (Aug 18)
- Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Len Rose (Aug 18)
- Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source S . f . Stover (Aug 18)
- RE: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Drew Copley (Aug 18)
- RE: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Person (Aug 18)
- RE: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Drew Copley (Aug 18)
- Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Andreas Gietl (Aug 18)
- RE: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Drew Copley (Aug 18)
- Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Andreas Gietl (Aug 19)
- Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Len Rose (Aug 18)
- Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Raj Mathur (Aug 18)
- Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Anthony Saffer (Aug 18)
- Re: Administrivia: Binary Executables w/o Source Stephen Clowater (Aug 19)