Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: EMPIRICAL SECURITY ADVISORY 0x02
From: hellnbak () nmrc org (hellNbak)
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 23:40:21 -0400 (EDT)
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2002-q3/1211.html Not to be picky but you have a couple errors in your advisory that I feel I must correct.
I was on the elevator the other day, going downstairs to get a cup of coffee the other day, when on the 2nd floor a herd of fucking CATTLE came on. These women were BIG.
If these women exceeded 166lbs each the elevator would have been far beyond load. A DoS in itself I would suspect. Also your calculation of the unit "Manzuik" was way off.
Steve Manzuik (hellNbak) Height: 5' 5" Width: 5' 5" Weight: 350lbs (this unit of measurement henceforth referred to as a "Manzuik")
It is more like Height: 6' 3" Width: 1' 3" Weight: 250lbs And these numbers are not even exact. Height can change with my state of arrousal (hows that for a mental picture....) as can width. Weight, well that is easily plus or minus 30lbs depending on a number of factors. So yeah, based on the numbers, and the forgotten gas ratio, you don't want any more than 8 Manzuik on the elevator. But most elevator contain redundant cabling and braking systems so this vulnerability is nothing but theoretical. Boy, its nice to be loved enough that I get the honor of being used in this example. Do you mind if I attach this advisory to my resume, I am sure I can drive up my consulting fees with it. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- "I don't intend to offend, I offend with my intent" hellNbak () nmrc org http://www.nmrc.org/~hellnbak -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- PS: Eat me bitch.
Current thread:
- RE: EMPIRICAL SECURITY ADVISORY 0x02 hellNbak (Sep 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: EMPIRICAL SECURITY ADVISORY 0x02 empirical () hushmail com (Sep 20)
- RE: EMPIRICAL SECURITY ADVISORY 0x02 Moyer, Shawn (Sep 20)