Full Disclosure mailing list archives
simple ltrace trick, was Re: blackfist(posted on request from prophet)
From: silvio () big net au (silvio () big net au)
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 17:29:43 -0700
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 10:43:35PM +0200, Mikhail Iakovlev wrote:
Suggestion to owners of mailing list: Configure your sendmail/qmail/whatever to block gobbles@* as blacklisted. Lets see how this turkey will fly than. I would love to see this guy having registered every day new email addy just to post it here, subscribe etc. That's where fun comes:) 1 line and restart of mail daemon for making him wasting his time, what more precious can we do?:) Shame this list is not on my server, otherwise I would play with this guy the way he would love:) Mik-
rememeber there exist multiple gobbles@, and i dont think blacklisting a single name is such a good idea - ever go on irc and see *.au banned etc. Is that annoying do you think? ok.. back to ltrace. a simple way of detecting if a specific call is being traced.. just do something like this --> ((*(unsigned char *)write) == 0xcc) umm.. why did i post 0xc3 before? i think i am on drugs today. -- Silvio
Current thread:
- blackfist(posted on request from prophet) zan (Sep 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- blackfist(posted on request from prophet) sockz loves you (Sep 18)
- blackfist(posted on request from prophet) sockz loves you (Sep 18)
- blackfist(posted on request from prophet) gobbles () hush com (Sep 18)
- blackfist(posted on request from prophet) sockz loves you (Sep 19)
- blackfist(posted on request from prophet) gobbles () hush com (Sep 19)
- blackfist(posted on request from prophet) Mikhail Iakovlev (Sep 19)
- simple ltrace trick, was Re: blackfist(posted on request from prophet) silvio () big net au (Sep 19)
- blackfist(posted on request from prophet) Mikhail Iakovlev (Sep 19)
- blackfist(posted on request from prophet) gobbles () hush com (Sep 19)
- blackfist(posted on request from prophet) gobbles () hush com (Sep 19)