Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: full disclosure?
From: aliver () hexeris mine nu (Aliver)
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:14:10 -0600
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, CybrSpy wrote:
I vote for killing threads like this reather than banning folks.
Don't kill the thread, and don't ban/kick them, either. Just ignore what you don't like unless it puts your life, liberty, or property in jeopardy. It's a skill that many modern Americans need to learn to develop (yes, I'm American). What I do is create a couple of "folders" to save my mail into. One is called "ignore_by_subject" and the other is "ignore_by_sender". Then I have a small script that pulls the appropriate field out mangles it a bit with some regexp's and adds it to a procmail filter. It took about 10 minutes or so to setup, and I didn't have to whine to someone else about my lack of ability to tolerate something. aliver -- Question: Is it better to abide by the rules until they're changed or help speed the change by breaking them?
Current thread:
- Full disclosure? Schmehl, Paul L (Sep 11)
- Full disclosure? John Cartwright (Sep 11)
- Full disclosure? Roman Drahtmueller (Sep 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Full disclosure? Boggs, Howard E. II (Sep 11)
- Full disclosure? Guy Cohen (Sep 11)
- Full disclosure? gobbles () hush com (Sep 11)
- Full disclosure? gobbles () hush com (Sep 11)
- Fwd: Re: Full disclosure? gobbles () hush com (Sep 11)
- Fwd: Re: Full disclosure? martin f krafft (Sep 11)
- Fwd: Re: Full disclosure? CybrSpy (Sep 11)
- Re: full disclosure? Aliver (Sep 11)
- Fwd: Re: Full disclosure? martin f krafft (Sep 11)
- Fwd: Re: Full disclosure? gobbles () hush com (Sep 11)