Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Full disclosure?
From: draht () suse de (Roman Drahtmueller)
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 20:35:13 +0200 (MEST)
Let's see if this makes it through to the list. I can confirm that at least one post to the list has been deleted (mine), so, so much for full disclosure. It was a nice thought while it lasted....
...not so fast. There are many reasons why a posting didn't make it to the list. Len Rose has been on the internet since the very beginning. Both Len Rose and John Cartwright enjoy an excellent reputation with respect to their commitment to privacy and security. I guess that it would take a while to find people who apply the old-school ethical code to their working style in the same way and who would be willing to run such a list despite the sabotage in the first weeks. You could have sent the message again if it didn't show up after 12 hours. This message came through, like the other 12 messages did since the end of July. It could as well be a problem on your own side.
Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu)
[...]
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Yes. Roman.
Current thread:
- Full disclosure? Schmehl, Paul L (Sep 11)
- Full disclosure? John Cartwright (Sep 11)
- Full disclosure? Roman Drahtmueller (Sep 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Full disclosure? Boggs, Howard E. II (Sep 11)
- Full disclosure? Guy Cohen (Sep 11)
- Full disclosure? gobbles () hush com (Sep 11)
- Full disclosure? gobbles () hush com (Sep 11)
- Fwd: Re: Full disclosure? gobbles () hush com (Sep 11)
- Fwd: Re: Full disclosure? martin f krafft (Sep 11)
- Fwd: Re: Full disclosure? CybrSpy (Sep 11)
- Re: full disclosure? Aliver (Sep 11)
- Fwd: Re: Full disclosure? martin f krafft (Sep 11)
- Fwd: Re: Full disclosure? gobbles () hush com (Sep 11)