Full Disclosure mailing list archives
60 Poot ze-a cheekee in de-a oofee!
From: eballen1 () qwest net (Bruce Ediger)
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:45:15 -0600 (MDT)
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, David Vincent wrote:
Even an unmoderated list requires some filtering of abusers. Otherwise, what good is a list charter?my point exactly.
At first, I thought the "Poot" messages were just spam. But the "GOBBLES" identity possesses a certain amount of credibility. Now, I believe that GOBBLES is revealing the multi-platform root exploit in steganographic fashion, spread out over many list articles. I just can't find anything obvious - the Swedish Chef text part of each "Poot" compares identically with every other one. Perhaps the invalid digital signatures contain the hidden bit(s).
Current thread:
- 60 Poot ze-a cheekee in de-a oofee! gobbles () hushmail com (Oct 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- 60 Poot ze-a cheekee in de-a oofee! David Vincent (Oct 10)
- 60 Poot ze-a cheekee in de-a oofee! Damian Gerow (Oct 10)
- 60 Poot ze-a cheekee in de-a oofee! Thor Larholm (Oct 11)
- 60 Poot ze-a cheekee in de-a oofee! Ron DuFresne (Oct 11)
- 60 yada yada *yawn* Nexus (Oct 10)
- 60 Poot ze-a cheekee in de-a oofee! Damian Gerow (Oct 10)
- 60 Poot ze-a cheekee in de-a oofee! David Vincent (Oct 11)
- 60 Poot ze-a cheekee in de-a oofee! Bruce Ediger (Oct 11)