Full Disclosure mailing list archives

60 Poot ze-a cheekee in de-a oofee!


From: dufresne () winternet com (Ron DuFresne)
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 06:20:03 -0500 (CDT)

On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Damian Gerow wrote:

Spake David Vincent on 10/10/2002, 13:41:25 -0700:
i'm a patient person, but surely the 25+ copies of this spam being sent to
the list is enough to get this address banned/bumped for at least a few
days?

spam sucks.

It's not actually gobbles sending out the message.  Check the validity
of the signature at hushtools.com.

As discussed to death in the past couple of weeks, if you don't like
the messages, see procmail(1) and procmailrc(5).

of course this technique is limited, or costly, as it gets rid of the
offending address<s> or subject's, and yet, requires all those responding
to these lame spams to be blackholed too.  Like the one responded to here.
Procmail, while a decent tool does not eliminate the issue in total, that
requires the list maintainers to take action.  Even an unmoderated list
requires some filtering of abusers.  Otherwise, what good is a list
charter?

Thanks,

Ron DuFresne
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity.  It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart
        ***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***

OK, so you're a Ph.D.  Just don't touch anything.



Current thread: