Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences
From: full-disclosure () lists netsys com (Dan Brosemer)
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:38:29 -0400
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:59:14AM +0100, John Cartwright wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 06:48:14PM -0400, Dan Brosemer wrote:How about leaving it as the poster specifies?FYI: "When set to Poster, no Reply-To: header is added by Mailman, although if one is present in the original message, it is not stripped." Apologies for not clarifying this before the poll started.
Thank you very much! I'm heading to vote now. -Dan -- "Burnished gallows set with red Caress the fevered, empty mind Of man who hangs bloodied and blind To reach for wisdom, not for bread." -- Deoridhe Grimsdaughter
Current thread:
- Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences John Cartwright (Aug 28)
- Re: Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences Dan Brosemer (Aug 28)
- Re: Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences KF (Aug 28)
- Re: Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences nonme (Aug 28)
- Re: Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences John Cartwright (Aug 29)
- Re: Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences Dan Brosemer (Aug 29)
- Re: Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences KF (Aug 28)
- Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences full-disclosure () lists netsys com (Aug 30)
- Re: Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences Dan Brosemer (Aug 28)