Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences
From: full-disclosure () lists netsys com (Dan Brosemer)
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 18:48:14 -0400
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 11:17:21PM +0100, John Cartwright wrote:
After seeing much debate on the subject, we've decided to resolve this issue in a democratic manner. Please vote at the below URL for your reply-to preference: should it be to the poster, or the list, by default. http://www.netalarms.com/story/2002/8/28/1462/54551 We'll make changes (if necessary) once the closing date has been reached (the 31st of this month).
How about leaving it as the poster specifies? It took me long enough to remove the "[Full-Disclosure]" BS from the subject lines. I'd rather not have to find a way to un-mangle the Reply-To: header as well. http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html -Dan -- "Burnished gallows set with red Caress the fevered, empty mind Of man who hangs bloodied and blind To reach for wisdom, not for bread." -- Deoridhe Grimsdaughter
Current thread:
- Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences John Cartwright (Aug 28)
- Re: Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences Dan Brosemer (Aug 28)
- Re: Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences KF (Aug 28)
- Re: Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences nonme (Aug 28)
- Re: Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences John Cartwright (Aug 29)
- Re: Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences Dan Brosemer (Aug 29)
- Re: Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences KF (Aug 28)
- Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences full-disclosure () lists netsys com (Aug 30)
- Re: Administrivia: Reply-To Preferences Dan Brosemer (Aug 28)