Just a suggestion

[full-disclosure () lists netsys com (Steve)]

On Wednesday 28 August 2002 04:39 pm, Snow, Corey wrote:
> OK, I'll bite. You'll first have to define "intended" and "disrupt". With a
> policy like this, the determination of what is "intended" to "disrupt" is

Yes it would be defined fully and completely. 
I'll read up on how the list is defined and post my sample "rules" and we'll 
see. (I'll keep it off list to those who are interested.)
-- 
 
Steve Szmidt
V.P. Information Technology
Video Group Distributors, Inc.