IDS mailing list archives

Re: Cisco IDS 4250 vs Sourcefire IS3000 + RNA Sensor


From: "Tim Holman" <tim_holman () hotmail com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:31:31 +0100

Hi Jonathan,

Wouldn't you rather block bad traffic, rather than detect it?
Most companies are moving away from IDS as a protection mechanism, because:

1)  It only detects, and doesn't effectively block intrusions
2) Problems with false positives, as by using pattern matching signatures, there is always a chance that these patterns also appear in valid traffic 3) Management overheads. An IDS can only be a reasonably effective prevention method if there is someone on hand 24/7 to monitor logs and take immediate action on intrusions. Even then , the intrusion has got in, as admins very rarely use the active blocking features of an IDS (namely sending RST packets to kill connections, or modifying upstream ACLs), as these are too likely to have an effect on valid traffic 4) There is absolutely no protection for rate-based attacks (SYN, TCP, UDP floods) 5) Without maintaining a L3/4 connection/state table, there is no way an IDS can be truly stateful. 100% statefulness means that everything from the initial SYN to the final RST/FIN packet of a connection is stored in a connection table. This requires the device to be INLINE, and operating at L3. This is the only way a protection device can provide effective defence against L3 attacks. An offline IDS cannot do this.

I would recommend looking at IPS products instead, so something that you can postion inline and get immediate value from. If you feel the Cisco IDS is getting a little tired, then an IPS will also help take the load off it, by getting rid of Internet white noise, providing additional firewall filtering, and also defence against rate-based attacks. A true IPS will focus on defining what is GOOD traffic, and assuming all else is BAD (and dropping it). By doing this, zero-day attacks can be virtually be eliminated, as they all ultimately rely on abuse of a valid protocol in the hope of slipping past your protection mechanisms and onto your network. This works quite well in conjucntion with an IDS, that focuses on searching traffic for badness. Replacing like for like (IDS for IDS) is not going to give you much value, and even the market analysts are recommending against it. IDS isn't dead. Far off it, but use it for what it's good for - DETECTION and FORENSICS, and not as a device that can insure your network against rate-based and zero-day attacks.

Regards,

Tim



----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Gauntt" <jon0966 () yahoo com>
To: <focus-ids () securityfocus com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 5:57 PM
Subject: Cisco IDS 4250 vs Sourcefire IS3000 + RNA Sensor


Hi,

We are currently running a Cisco IDS 4250 that monitors our internal
traffic. We essentially use this device for historical reporting because we
are a medical oriented facility with at least 100 3rd party connections to
us besides the 8000 employees.

I am considering upgrading the Cisco IDS 4250 to the XL to handle higher
throughput but have been evaluating the Sourcefire IS300 and their RNA
sensor.

I have the ability to purchase the Sourcefire unit or upgrade the 4250.

Sourcefire claims that they are superior with state full IDS inspection and
an overall better product.

Does anyone have any thoughts on these two products? I have about $100k in
my budget to spend.

Thanks,


Jonathan



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS

Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it
with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS

Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: