IDS mailing list archives

RE: amount of alarms generated by IDS


From: "Rob Shein" <shoten () starpower net>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 13:37:16 -0400

Simple.  An inline IDS is one that sits inline, and thus doesn't have to
listen promiscuously.  There are a few situations where you might want this.
The reason why there are two separate terms..."inline IDS" and "IPS"...is
because they are two separate things.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ravishankar Ithal [mailto:ravi_ithal () yahoo com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 1:14 PM
To: Rob Shein; 'Bhargav Bhikkaji'; focus-ids () securityfocus com
Subject: RE: amount of alarms generated by IDS



--- Rob Shein <shoten () starpower net> wrote:
I'm a bit confused here.  You're talking about inline IDS and IPS.  
Are you using the terms interchangably?  If so, you're mistaken; 
putting an IDS inline does not make it an IPS.  And an IDS inline 
shouldn't be dropping packets.

If an IDS doesn't have the ability to drop packets, why would 
you call it "inline"? Note that sitting in the packet path or 
as an offline box doesn't make any difference in the amount 
and kind of traffic that the box can actually see, what with 
spanning on switches. I _am_ using the two terms 
interchangably, simply because IPSs of today are nothing but 
IDSs of yesterday with an ability to drop malicious looking packets.

I could see how the signatures could be tuned differently 
due to the 
fact that it is able to ensure that it sees everything, and 
that could 
generate fewer FPs, but aside from that I doubt there would be any 
difference.  Keep in mind that an inline IDS does not (normally) do 
anything to bad traffic, while an IPS takes an active role in 
munging/blocking/denying such.





      
              
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs  
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover 



---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: