Re: State of security technology for the enterprise

[david () lang hm]

On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Paul D. Robertson wrote:

> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Chris Hughes wrote:
>
> > "mainstream" as missing the mark.  The problem is, on an enterprise level,
> > most companies are not willing to look at open source solutions or vendors
> > they have never heard of.  They want brand names that can be supported by a
> > wide audience of engineers.
>
> I've never seen that level of reluctance at any large enterprise I've
> worked or consulted for.  In fact, in these economic times, "it's free" is
> a lot more palatable than "you need to spend $10,000."  I'd gently suggest
> that the security "sale" for the requirement isn't being done well enough
> if you can't choose best of breed open source tools- especially if the
> argument is "wide audeience of engineers."  If your "wide audience" is
> that narrowly focused, then I'd suggest removing the term "engineer" from
> their titles and substituting "monkeys!"

oh, this level of reluctance is very definantly alive and well, even in 
these economic times. I've got folks insisting that I rip out the working 
opensource equipment and replace it with 'real' firewalls (which turns out 
to mean Cisco equipment. it looks like they are going to force the 
Sidewinders to be removed as well)

David Lang

_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards