Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: OT? New compromise.
From: "Mark" <firewalladmin () bellsouth net>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:35:25 -0400
Hi guys, it's just me lurking (always lurking, rarely posting). Anyway, one can tell this forum is a lot of *nix and Cisco guys. The built in WinXP utility netstat has had the -o and -b options for years now. The former will show you the owning process id associated with a connection and the latter will list the executable involved. Used to be you had to use fport by sysinternals, but not any more. Take care, Mark -----Original Message----- From: firewall-wizards-bounces () listserv icsalabs com [mailto:firewall-wizards-bounces () listserv icsalabs com] On Behalf Of Mattias Ahnberg Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 2:30 AM To: Firewall Wizards Security Mailing List Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] OT? New compromise. J. Oquendo wrote:
program called openports which would run on the machine and relate any LISTENING or ESTABLISHED ports to the actual file that has the port open. This would then give you the service/process/program waiting for traffic on that port.On Windows /c:\netstat -an |find /i "listening"/ Why download when you can use existing tools...
Because that command does not let you know what application on your local machine has the port bound? There are tools like openports or the sysinternals set you may use for that purpose, but to my knowledge there aren't any built into Windows itself to do this. -- /ahnberg. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: FW: OT? New compromise., (continued)
- Re: FW: OT? New compromise. Mitko Stoyanov (Mar 29)
- Re: OT? New compromise. St John, Richard (Mar 28)
- Re: OT? New compromise. J. Oquendo (Mar 28)
- Re: OT? New compromise. Stian Øvrevåge (Mar 28)
- Re: OT? New compromise. Jim Seymour (Mar 29)
- Re: OT? New compromise. Paul D. Robertson (Mar 29)
- Re: OT? New compromise. J. Oquendo (Mar 29)
- Re: OT? New compromise. Paul D. Robertson (Mar 29)
- Re: OT? New compromise. J. Oquendo (Mar 28)
- Re: OT? New compromise. Victor Williams (Mar 29)
- Re: OT? New compromise. Mattias Ahnberg (Mar 29)
- Re: OT? New compromise. Mark (Mar 29)
- Re: OT? New compromise. Richard Golodner (Mar 29)
- Re: OT? New compromise. Frank Knobbe (Mar 31)