Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: OT? New compromise.
From: Mattias Ahnberg <mattias () ahnberg pp se>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 08:30:08 +0200
J. Oquendo wrote:
program called openports which would run on the machine and relate any LISTENING or ESTABLISHED ports to the actual file that has the port open. This would then give you the service/process/program waiting for traffic on that port.On Windows /c:\netstat -an |find /i "listening"/ Why download when you can use existing tools...
Because that command does not let you know what application on your local machine has the port bound? There are tools like openports or the sysinternals set you may use for that purpose, but to my knowledge there aren't any built into Windows itself to do this. -- /ahnberg. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: FW: OT? New compromise., (continued)
- Re: FW: OT? New compromise. Jim Seymour (Mar 28)
- Re: FW: OT? New compromise. Mitko Stoyanov (Mar 29)
- Re: FW: OT? New compromise. Jim Seymour (Mar 28)
- Re: OT? New compromise. St John, Richard (Mar 28)
- Re: OT? New compromise. J. Oquendo (Mar 28)
- Re: OT? New compromise. Stian Øvrevåge (Mar 28)
- Re: OT? New compromise. Jim Seymour (Mar 29)
- Re: OT? New compromise. Paul D. Robertson (Mar 29)
- Re: OT? New compromise. J. Oquendo (Mar 29)
- Re: OT? New compromise. Paul D. Robertson (Mar 29)
- Re: OT? New compromise. J. Oquendo (Mar 28)
- Re: OT? New compromise. Victor Williams (Mar 29)
- Re: OT? New compromise. Mattias Ahnberg (Mar 29)
- Re: OT? New compromise. Mark (Mar 29)
- Re: OT? New compromise. Richard Golodner (Mar 29)
- Re: OT? New compromise. Frank Knobbe (Mar 31)