Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum
From: ArkanoiD <ark () eltex net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 00:29:14 +0300
Just because (no offence implied) Cyberguard is an "intelligent choice" and Checkpoint usually means "relying on market leader" with possible lack technical analysis. That's why. Not always. Just usually. Or at least sometimes. (well, for PIXen i do not see a reason for them to exist at all, except "our network is Cisco-based" which does look valid for me. If you need a good packet filter, get a Netscreen) And, after all, implicit rules are terrible so Checkpoint config is quite obscure. On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 11:14:06PM +0200, Avishai Wool wrote:
On 1/25/06, ArkanoiD <ark () eltex net> wrote:nuqneH, Though i think people who buy Checkpoint stuff are somehow non-representative (i think if one tried that with, say, Cyberguard, we'd see completely different picture)WIth all due respect, I must disagree on two counts: 1) like it or not, there are LOTS of Check Points out there, protecting networks that we as an industry and we as individuals should care about: our banks, schools, governments, telecom carriers, whatever. So they "represent" a huge chunk of "firewall space". 2) My conclusion from that paper is NOT that "Check Point sucks". I don't think it's fundamentaly worse or better than other vendors. In fact, I believe that firewall misconfigurations are only marginally influenced by the choice of vendor. I have raw data for a bigger study that includes Cisco PIXes too - and the picture isn't prettier. IMHO, the root causes for misconfigurations are human: we people just can't wrap our heads around the complexity of big firewall configs. The data shows a striking correlation between rulebase complexity and number of errors. If you want a 1-line conclusion: keep your config small if you want it to be secure. So why would Cyberguard, or any other product, be better configured? The same types of people, in the same organizations, would run it... or is Cyberguard only sold to admins that pass a cluefullness test? AvishaiOn Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 05:32:49PM +0200, Avishai Wool wrote:Paul didn't say where he got that tidbit from (and 87.3% of all statistics are made up anyway :-) but if you want some hard numbers to back up the spirit of his claim, you can check out: A. Wool. A quantitative study of firewall configuration errors. IEEE Computer, 37(6):62-67, 2004. http://www.eng.tau.ac.il/~yash/computer2004.pdf Cheers Avishai -- Avishai Wool, Ph.D., Chief Technical Officer, Algorithmic Security Inc. http://www.algosec.com **** Want to audit or debug your firewall's policy? ***-- -- Avishai Wool, Ph.D., Chief Technical Officer, Algorithmic Security Inc. http://www.algosec.com **** Want to audit or debug your firewall's policy? ***
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: RE: IDS (was: FW appliance comparison), (continued)
- Re: RE: IDS (was: FW appliance comparison) Paul D. Robertson (Jan 25)
- Re: RE: IDS (was: FW appliance comparison) Brian Loe (Jan 25)
- Message not available
- Re: RE: IDS (was: FW appliance comparison) Marcus J. Ranum (Jan 27)
- Message not available
- Re: RE: IDS (was: FW appliance comparison) Brian Loe (Jan 26)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Devdas Bhagat (Jan 25)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Christine Kronberg (Jan 24)
- Message not available
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Avishai Wool (Jan 25)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Paul D. Robertson (Jan 25)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum ArkanoiD (Jan 25)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Avishai Wool (Jan 25)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum ArkanoiD (Jan 25)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Patrick M. Hausen (Jan 27)
- RE: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum lordchariot (Jan 27)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Anton Chuvakin (Jan 27)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Paul D. Robertson (Jan 20)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Greg Spath (Jan 20)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Patrick M. Hausen (Jan 18)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Marcus J. Ranum (Jan 18)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Marcus J. Ranum (Jan 18)
- RE: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Paul Melson (Jan 18)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Patrick M. Hausen (Jan 18)