Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: Cisco acls
From: "Behm, Jeffrey L." <BehmJL () bvsg com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:39:21 -0600
Eric Appelboom stated forth:
My concern is that when someone amends an access-list one generally enters, no access-list 177 and Then pastes in the new access list.
And then you reapply the newly pasted ACL onto the interface...;-)
Does this mean that for a period of time there is no protection on the Network that the acls applies?
Yup. My understanding is that there is no protection while the ACL is removed. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco acls, (continued)
- Re: Cisco acls Daniel Linder (Mar 04)
- RE: Cisco acls Bruce Smith (Mar 04)
- RE: Cisco acls Mark Teicher (Mar 12)
- Re: Cisco acls Kevin (Mar 24)
- RE: Cisco acls Mark Teicher (Mar 12)
- Re: Cisco acls Steve Saeedi (Mar 04)
- Re: Cisco acls Luca Berra (Mar 07)
- RE: Cisco acls Mathew Want (Mar 04)
- RE: Cisco acls Ben Nagy (Mar 04)
- Re: Cisco acls Stephane (Mar 04)
- Re: Cisco acls Miha Vitorovic (Mar 24)
- RE: Cisco acls Behm, Jeffrey L. (Mar 04)
- RE: Cisco acls Matthew.Harvey () usdoj gov (Mar 04)
- RE: Cisco acls Paul Melson (Mar 04)
- Re: Cisco acls Luca Berra (Mar 07)
- RE: Cisco acls Luke Butcher (Mar 06)
- RE: Cisco acls Luke Butcher (Mar 07)
- RE: Cisco acls Andrew Yourtchenko (Mar 12)
- RE: Cisco acls MHawkins (Mar 07)
- RE: Cisco acls Scott Stursa (Mar 12)
- Re: Cisco acls Mark Teicher (Mar 24)
- RE: Cisco acls Luke Butcher (Mar 24)
(Thread continues...)