Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: i-cap proposals
From: ArkanoiD <ark () eltex net>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:42:34 +0300
Ok, the bottom line is: i prefer implemented and working security policy over "ideal" one that is being constantly violated. And - accessing external email server with proper content inspection in place implements exactly the same filtering policy local server does, so i doubt the risk is higher, and it brings a feature to separate corporate email from personal, which is often useful. Non-performance issues. Hah! You really do think someone will work more efficient if you just prohibit him from spending work time on non-business issues? I say plain NO. Any decent book on managing IT projects states it works exactly reverse. On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 09:23:58AM -0500, Paul D. Robertson wrote:
P.S Yes, sure i've seen many companies where people are not allowed to use external mail servers. Almost 100% of them just forced people to use business addresses for personal communications this way (although that was not formally allowed) and i do not think this makes any difference.Then you've likely never had to deal with hostile workplace lawsuits, employee termination for non-performance issues, privacy issues during an investigation of malice, or a host of other things where the systems belonging to the employer make the security administrator's job significantly easier. Also, note that for most workplaces, the AUP takes away privacy protections on the network- suddenly opening your personal communications to increased scrutiny and decreased legal protections.
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- i-cap proposals ArkanoiD (Feb 11)
- RE: i-cap proposals lordchariot (Feb 12)
- Re: i-cap proposals ArkanoiD (Feb 14)
- Re: i-cap proposals Carson Gaspar (Feb 19)
- Re: i-cap proposals ArkanoiD (Feb 19)
- Re: i-cap proposals Paul D. Robertson (Feb 22)
- Re: i-cap proposals ArkanoiD (Feb 22)
- Re: i-cap proposals Paul D. Robertson (Feb 22)
- Re: i-cap proposals ArkanoiD (Feb 22)
- Re: i-cap proposals Paul D. Robertson (Feb 22)
- Re: i-cap proposals ArkanoiD (Feb 22)
- Re: i-cap proposals Paul D. Robertson (Feb 22)
- Re: i-cap proposals ArkanoiD (Feb 22)
- Re: i-cap proposals Paul D. Robertson (Feb 22)
- Re: i-cap proposals ArkanoiD (Feb 14)
- RE: i-cap proposals lordchariot (Feb 12)
- Re: i-cap proposals Julian Gomez (Feb 22)