Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
PKI is the pits?
From: Christopher Hicks <chicks () chicks net>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 21:37:48 -0400 (EDT)
I got this in my Linux Today newsletter for today: EBCVG: TEN THINGS I WISH THEY WARNED ME ABOUT PKI "In this paper we look at a number of pratical organizational issues that pure PKI suppliers often fail to mention..." COMPLETE STORY: http://nl.internet.com/ct.html?rtr=on&s=1,166k,1,48kz,m734,bfaz,g6x1My read of the actual article (which you can find directly at http://www.ebcvg.com/articles.php?id=271 if you want to avoid getting clicktracked) ... the actual article is much more scathing than this short summary would indicate. I don't think many folks would even try to implement PKI after reading this. So, as a rather lazy Linux admin I'm compelled to ask: do others who have swallowed the PKI pill lived to tell the story? Is it really this bad? What can be done better? Is anybody trying to do it better?
-- </chris> Westheimer's Discovery: "A coupla months in the laboratory can save a coupla hours in the library." _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- PKI is the pits? Christopher Hicks (Oct 14)
- Re: PKI is the pits? Bennett Todd (Oct 14)
- RE: PKI is the pits? Eugene Kuznetsov (Oct 17)
- RE: PKI is the pits? Marcus J. Ranum (Oct 17)
- PIX Books Shimon Silberschlag (Oct 22)
- Re: PIX Books Josh Welch (Oct 22)
- Re: PIX Books greg padden (Oct 22)
- Re: PIX Books Matthew Powell (Oct 25)
- RE: PIX Books sci-admin (Oct 30)
- RE: PKI is the pits? Eugene Kuznetsov (Oct 22)
- RE: PKI is the pits? Marcus J. Ranum (Oct 17)