Firewall Wizards mailing list archives

RE: Firewall routing thought...


From: "Ben Nagy" <ben () iagu net>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 17:19:45 +0200

-----Original Message-----
[...]
From: Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr
[...]

On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Eric Appelboom wrote:
If one has firewall A with external ip on the same subnet 
as firewall B.
How common is the practice of adding static routes on 
firewall A for 
The networks protected by firewall B and the other way round.
[...]
First of all, it's not likely to improve your latency or 
overhead. The packets are still going to be seen by the router.

I don't think that's right, unless I've misunderstood the environment
description.

If hosts A and B are firewalls and C is a router on the same subnet, which
is also the default route for A and B then traffic from A to the network
_behind_ B will be sent to C to route. C will probably also send an ICMP
redirect to tell A to route through B. This new route will stick around for
a while in some protocol, not at all for others.

With a static route, A will send traffic for Net_Behind_B straight to B.
That's better.

Secondly, you've now added complexity to your network in the 
form of a bunch of static routes in different places, all of 
which need to be maintained - and almost certainly won't be, 
until some changes breaks things.

"a tad messy" is almost always a signal to run away 
screaming.  That's code for "unmaintainable" and "all-nighters".

I quite like this document. Mainly for the Southpark references, I think.

http://www.qorbit.net/documents/icmp-redirects-are-bad.htm

I'm not much of a fan of the maintainability of static routes either,
though. Basically, you may choose your poison. A third poison you didn't
mention is dynamic routing, which fixes the routing optimisation _and_ the
manageability. Sadly it totally _screws_ the security, so as poisons go it's
pretty...um...poisonous.

Cheers,

ben


_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards


Current thread: