Re: FWTK vs T.REX

[ark () eltex ru]

I did not like T.Rex. It appeared as badly assembled pile of code of
questionable quality from various source for me. And one of sources
is, indeed, fwtk (with copyrights removed, which is no good itself)

On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 05:03:24PM +0100, Javier Perez wrote:
> Hello gurus!!
>
> I have to implement a non-commercial proxy firewall
> solution and I've found about FWTK and T.REX. I see
> that FWTK is a bit outdated but might do the trick.
> T.REX seems much more powerful..
>
> any experiences, advices, ideas?
>
> Javi
>
> ___________________________________________________
> Yahoo! MСviles
> Personaliza tu mСvil con tu logo y melodМa favorito 
> en http://moviles.yahoo.es
> _______________________________________________
> firewall-wizards mailing list
> firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
> http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards

-- 
                                     _     _  _  _  _      _  _
 {::} {::} {::}  CU in Hell          _| o |_ | | _|| |   / _||_|   |_ |_ |_
 (##) (##) (##)        /Arkan#iD    |_  o  _||_| _||_| /   _|  | o |_||_||_|
 [||] [||] [||]            Do i believe in Bible? Hell,man,i've seen one!
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards