Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Re: Firewalls breaking stuff: [Was re: fwtk]
From: Dana Nowell <DanaNowell () cornerstonesoftware com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:36:53 -0400
I'm afraid I'm a little late to the party as I've been out on vacation. But ...
On Fri, 19 Jul 2002, Paul Robertson wrote: I think you can certianly make the argument that given $programmer with $number of bugs/kloc, reducing kloc reduces $number. Given severe/bugs, reducing bugs reduces the number of sever bugs. Also adding in functionality generally needing to increase complexity, and at least statistically I think you can assume that you'll have less severe problems and problems of lesser severity when you reduce functionality/code.
In my experience, it depends :-). In general if the code removed was all the simple boilerplate stuff and the code remaining was all the nasty complex stuff, the absolute number of bugs remains roughly constant and the number/kloc increases. It's the age old issue, bugs/kloc implies that all kloc are created equal, and they aren't. In fact they are frequently not even close. Take a good programmer, have him/her write code they are used to writing, take same programmer have them write nasty low level protocol crap they have never even heard of before, wanna bet the bugs/kloc are the same? Now assume you have someone working on a project where 70% is simple straight forward stuff and 30% is mean nasty low level crap they've never/rarely done before. Because I'm a security minded manager, I remove one third of the project, but from the simple part, I keep all the nasty stuff because I need it. Are you REALLY saying I dropped one third of the bugs? REALLY? Now if you were implying the age old, "the programmer used is equally good at all aspects of the project" hence all kloc are the same... Can I hire YOUR staff, mine seems deficient. :-). Dana Nowell Cornerstone Software Inc. Voice: (603) 595-7480 Fax: (603) 882-7313 mailto:DanaNowell () CornerstoneSoftware com _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: Re: Firewalls breaking stuff: [Was re: fwtk] Charles Swiger (Jul 20)
- Re: Re: Firewalls breaking stuff: [Was re: fwtk] Paul D. Robertson (Jul 20)
- Re: Re: Firewalls breaking stuff: [Was re: fwtk] Charles W. Swiger (Jul 22)
- Re: Re: Firewalls breaking stuff: [Was re: fwtk] Paul Robertson (Jul 22)
- Re: Re: Firewalls breaking stuff: [Was re: fwtk] Charles W. Swiger (Jul 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Re: Firewalls breaking stuff: [Was re: fwtk] Dana Nowell (Jul 23)
- Re: Re: Firewalls breaking stuff: [Was re: fwtk] Paul Robertson (Jul 23)
- Message not available
- Re: Re: Firewalls breaking stuff: [Was re: fwtk] Dana Nowell (Jul 23)
- Re: Re: Firewalls breaking stuff: [Was re: fwtk] Paul D. Robertson (Jul 20)