Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Outlook Web Access - Paranoid?
From: Devdas Bhagat <dvb () users sourceforge net>
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 09:59:14 +0530
On 30/11/02 11:39 -0800, Matt Wilbur wrote: <snip>
If you just need to give end users access to email and email directory services from the outside, why not use one of the many "webmail" applications out there, all of which need far less access to your internal networks. You could plunk, for example, squirrelmail out on a DMZ system, allow port 143 (IMAP) and port 389 (LDAP) to an exchange
I would suggest imaps(993) and ldaps(636). If your webmail client doesn't support that, zebeedee or stunnel could help in creating the SSL connections. No use running plain text all over the place when SSL certificates are free. Devdas Bhagat _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- RE: Outlook Web Access - Paranoid? Matt Wilbur (Nov 30)
- Re: Outlook Web Access - Paranoid? Devdas Bhagat (Dec 01)
- Re: Outlook Web Access - Paranoid? Mikael Olsson (Dec 01)
- IP/HTTP from the internet to internal network Shimon Silberschlag (Dec 02)
- Re: IP/HTTP from the internet to internal network Paul D. Robertson (Dec 02)
- Message not available
- Re: IP/HTTP from the internet to internal network Dave Piscitello (Dec 04)
- Re: Outlook Web Access - Paranoid? Mikael Olsson (Dec 01)
- Re: Outlook Web Access - Paranoid? Luca Berra (Dec 02)
- Re: Outlook Web Access - Paranoid? Devdas Bhagat (Dec 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Outlook Web Access - Paranoid? Stefan Norberg (Dec 03)
- RE: Outlook Web Access - Paranoid? Joseph Steinberg (Dec 05)