Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Email Appliances
From: Mikael Olsson <mikael.olsson () clavister com>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 20:58:42 +0200
Paul Robertson wrote:
[...] if you have one of those layer 8[1] problems. [1] Political layer.
That would be layer 9, since the layer 8 security problem is, simply, "users"[2]. "Execs" are typically layered above "users" in full conformance with basic layering principles[3]. /Mike [2] I'm still upset about not getting to finish last year's Defcon TCP/IP drinking game with that question. &%#¤#¤ (Hey, I was thirsty!) [3] A high-abstraction layer doesn't know anything about what really goes on in the lower layers, it simply uses them.[4] [4] More footnotes than message body. Uh oh. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Email Appliances Behm, Jeffrey L. (Aug 02)
- Re: Email Appliances Paul Robertson (Aug 02)
- Re: Email Appliances Richard Threadgill (Aug 02)
- Re: Email Appliances Paul Robertson (Aug 02)
- Re: Email Appliances Mikael Olsson (Aug 02)
- Re: Email Appliances Paul Robertson (Aug 02)
- Message not available
- Re: Email Appliances Marcus J. Ranum (Aug 02)
- Reverse Inspecting Proxy Definition Paul Timmerman (Aug 05)
- Stealth Firewall Definition Paul Timmerman (Aug 05)
- Re: Email Appliances Richard Threadgill (Aug 02)
- Re: Email Appliances Paul Robertson (Aug 02)