Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: POP vs IMAP vs MAPI - security through firewalls?
From: Michael Nelson <mikenel () iapetus com>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 21:35:44 -0500 (EST)
They were told they had to use MS MAPI to read the mail, and so they would have to open TCP ports 135-139, 50000, 50001, and perhaps others to be named later. They were also told that MAPI must be used because it is "slightly more secure" than POP3 or IMAP4.
See http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q148/7/32.asp. Having 137-139 open isn't necessary. -mike _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- POP vs IMAP vs MAPI - security through firewalls? Joseph S D Yao (Feb 25)
- RE: POP vs IMAP vs MAPI - security through firewalls? Chris Crozier (Feb 26)
- Re: POP vs IMAP vs MAPI - security through firewalls? Joseph S D Yao (Feb 26)
- Re: POP vs IMAP vs MAPI - security through firewalls? Michael Nelson (Feb 26)
- Re: POP vs IMAP vs MAPI - security through firewalls? Patrick Darden (Feb 26)
- Re: POP vs IMAP vs MAPI - security through firewalls? Rick Murphy (Feb 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: POP vs IMAP vs MAPI - security through firewalls? Ben Nagy (Feb 26)
- Re: POP vs IMAP vs MAPI - security through firewalls? Joseph S D Yao (Feb 26)
- RE: POP vs IMAP vs MAPI - security through firewalls? Jan van Rensburg (Feb 26)
- RE: POP vs IMAP vs MAPI - security through firewalls? Chris Crozier (Feb 26)