Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Y2K fix for 'elm' (Was: Re: How should NAT terminate ?)
From: Joseph S D Yao <jsdy () cospo osis gov>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 17:48:39 -0500
On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 09:38:44PM +0100, Mikael Olsson wrote:
BTW, your copy of ELM has Y2K problems: "Date: Sat, 8 Jan 100 01:04:08 +1100 (EST)" *ahem* :-) ^^^
Known problem. All too common. Solutions include: (1) switch to Mutt <URL: http://www.mutt.org/> (2) switch to newer version of 'elm' (2.5.2), losing all the mods that people have made to 2.4* (3) switch to Mutt, which has all of those capabilities and more. (4) modify lib/getarpdate.c: char * get_arpa_date() { ... if ((year = curr_tm.tm_year) < 100) year += 1900; to read instead: year = curr_tm.tm_year + 1900; (5) switch to Mutt (6) switch to Mutt [Can you guess which one I implemented for stubborn folks, and which one I did for myself? ;-)] -- Joe Yao jsdy () cospo osis gov - Joseph S. D. Yao COSPO/OSIS Computer Support EMT-B ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This message is not an official statement of COSPO policies.
Current thread:
- How should NAT terminate ? Darren Reed (Jan 09)
- Re: How should NAT terminate ? Mikael Olsson (Jan 10)
- Re: How should NAT terminate ? Darren Reed (Jan 12)
- Re: How should NAT terminate ? Mikael Olsson (Jan 15)
- Y2K fix for 'elm' (Was: Re: How should NAT terminate ?) Joseph S D Yao (Jan 20)
- Re: Y2K fix for 'elm' (Was: Re: How should NAT terminate ?) Darren Reed (Jan 20)
- Re: How should NAT terminate ? Darren Reed (Jan 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: How should NAT terminate ? Ben Nagy (Jan 10)
- RE: How should NAT terminate ? Johnny Shelley (Jan 12)
- Re: How should NAT terminate ? Darren Reed (Jan 12)
- Re: How should NAT terminate ? TC Wolsey (Jan 10)
- RE: How should NAT terminate ? James R Grinter (Jan 12)
- RE: How should NAT terminate ? Ben Nagy (Jan 13)
- Re: How should NAT terminate ? Mikael Olsson (Jan 10)