Firewall Wizards mailing list archives

DDoS: Food for thought.


From: Darren Reed <darrenr () reed wattle id au>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 100 22:45:34 +1100 (EST)

For those of you that don't read ISN, make an effort.

Regardless, if you haven't, read below.

Some interesting observations about events, particularly the
timing of when various things happened.

From my personal perspective, a friend of mine was telling me
last year that on university he was associated with had been
black holing an IRC server for some time due to it being
attacked with a farily regular bitstream in the 100s of megabits
per second.  That never made it into press, as far as I know.

Cheers,
Darren

----- Forwarded message from William Knowles -----

From owner-isn () SECURITYFOCUS COM Tue Feb 22 23:10:01 2000
Approved-By: jericho () DIMENSIONAL COM
Delivered-To: isn () lists securityfocus com
Delivered-To: isn () securityfocus com
X-Sender: wk () idle curiosity org
X-Organization: C4I Secure Solutions - http://www.c4i.org
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.4.04.10002190149050.22484-100000 () idle curiosity org>
Date:         Sat, 19 Feb 2000 01:52:48 -0600
Reply-To: William Knowles <wk () C4I ORG>
Sender: ISN Mailing List <ISN () SECURITYFOCUS COM>
From: William Knowles <wk () C4I ORG>
Subject:      [ISN] Hacker, Media Hype, & Disinformation
X-To:         InfoSec News <isn () securityfocus com>,
              HackerNewsNetwork <contact () hackernews com>
To: ISN () SECURITYFOCUS COM

http://cryptome.org/madsen-hmhd.htm

17 February 2000. Thanks to Wayne Madsen <WMadsen777 () aol com>

HACKERS, MEDIA HYPE, AND DISINFORMATION

WAYNE MADSEN

For what it is worth, I am a 20-year veteran of the computer security
community. I have served in the Navy, National Security Agency, State
Department, Computer Sciences Corporation, RCA, and have consulted on
computer security with the National Institute of Standards and
Technology, international banks, telecom companies and even firms that
manufacture candy.

While working for the FBI and Naval Investigative Service, I put one
US Navy official in Federal prison for espionage and other crimes, and
I was involved in U.S. counter-terrorism work in Greece and the
Philippines. I think I know how the "spook" community operates and,
more importantly, how it thinks.

The hype associated with the recent Internet flooding is outrageous
and serves the agendas of the military and intelligence communities
regarding new vistas for bloated Pentagon and espionage budgets.

On 17 February, National Public Radio's Diane Rehm Show had a round
table discussion featuring James Adams, a former London Sunday Times
reporter in Washington who is now a drum beater for information
warfare, and Jeffrey Hunker, the former head of the White House
Critical Infrastructure Assurance Office. Adams suggested that for
critical infrastructure protection certain civil liberties must be
forfeited. He also stated that Internet transactions should not be
afforded the same degree of privacy as the U.S. mail.

Hunker was uncomfortable that some people think that scare mongering
has been at the center of the recent packet flooding of the Internet.
Adams supported the CIA's creation of IN-Q-IT, a CIA Trojan Horse in
the Silicon Valley. According to Adams, Science Applications
International Corporation (SAIC), a virtual CIA proprietary firm, is
funding, through IN-Q-IT, a program called Net Eraser. None of the
participants in the Rehm Show were willing to talk about Net Eraser
and some seemed very nervous about discussing it in detail.

This radio program is highly indicative of the current hype
surrounding the Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) attacks on DOT
COM sites on the Internet. Even the use of the acronym DDOS is
amazing. Here they are, twenty-something DOT COM executives, who
probably never thought about computer security except for watching
re-runs of "Hackers" and "Sneakers," using Pentagon-originated terms
like "Distributed Denial of Service" attacks.

Why? Who told them to use those terms?

Then Clinton manages to take 90 minutes to attend an Internet security
summit on February 15. Northern Ireland's peace agreement is falling
apart, the Israeli-Palestine agreement is unraveling, and Russia's new
President is putting ex-KGB agents in his government, but Clinton has
enough time to talk with a group of e-commerce barons, computer
security geeks, and even one hacker. The whole thing appeared to be
staged and scheduled way in advance.

The whole so-called Internet "hack" smells of a perception management
campaign by the intelligence community. Perhaps the system flooding
was coordinated by one group -- however, those types of attacks
probably occur on a daily basis without being reported by the world's
media. It is important to note that one of the key components of
information warfare -- according to the Pentagon's own seminal
documents -- is perception management -- psychological operations to
whip up public support for a policy or program. The early Defense
Science Board reports on Critical Infrastructure Protection actually
call for a campaign to change the public's attitude about information
system and network security.

The Pentagon is a master at deception campaigns aimed at the news
media. They constantly broadcast disinformation to television and
radio audiences in Haiti, Serbia, Colombia, Mexico and elsewhere. They
are now extending this to cyber space. Critical infrastructure
protection is a masterful ruse aimed at creating the myth of impeding
cyber-peril.

The major domo is a weird chap named Richard Clarke, a Dr.
Strangelove-type character who is Clinton's counter-terrorism czar. He
always talks about defensive cyber-warfare but clams up when it comes
to offensive US cyber-operations. That is classified.

However, it is certain that the US Government has already done more to
disrupt the Internet than any other actor -- state-sponsored or
freelance. For the past few years, US government hackers have
penetrated networks at the European Parliament, Australian Stock
Exchange, and banks in Athens, Nicosia, Moscow, Johannesburg, Beirut,
Tel Aviv, Zurich, and Vaduz. The US also engaged in network
penetrations in Yugoslavia during the NATO war against that country.

Why doesn't NPR, CBS, ABC, NBC and the others focus on what the US is
doing to disrupt the Internet? They are instead falling into a
familiar Pentagon trap of deception and diversion.


---------------------------------------------------
"Communications without intelligence is noise;
Intelligence without communications is irrelevant."
Gen. Alfred. M. Gray, USMC
---------------------------------------------------
C4I Secure Solutions             http://www.c4i.org
*=================================================*

ISN is sponsored by Security-Focus.COM

----- End of forwarded message from William Knowles -----



Current thread: