Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Recent Attacks
From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts () clark net>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 09:49:13 -0500 (EST)
On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Ryan Russell wrote:
And E-trade, where *timing* matters a lot to their customers? --Steve BellovinFor E-trade, it makes a lot more sense that business would be lost that would happen then and only then (well, mostly... I'm sure some folks will still sell even after the stock dropped below what they meant to sell at.)
But then the damages aren't just to E*Trade, they're to their customers too. Even if they still sell, they've lost real money.
It makes sense to punish the attacker exta on behalf of the customers of E-trade *IFF* E-Trade does something along those lines for normal outages.
Why the if? The law shouldn't care about "normal" policy, it should care about the results of the illegal action.
(I think they've had some, and I don't think they did anything for the customers, did they? Hmm..lesse, our click-wrap agreement says "Screw You.")
Irrelevent under the law as I understand it (which isn't all that well I suppose.)
All I want is for prosecutors, judges, and law enforcement to put some intelligent thought into what the damages really were. I still say the attacker couldn't have done 1.2B in damages, and that's the "crucifixtion" dollar amount.
Bad market day, people trying to get out of positions at pre-set ammounts or as soon as possible - yeah, 1.2B isn't that difficult to reach in those conditions.
If someone decides that mapping out the Internet to produce nice-looking graphs constitutes a criminal port-scanning attack, you would want to have someone force the prosecutors to name reasonable damages, right? You
(You're picking on the wrong one.) Paul ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions proberts () clark net which may have no basis whatsoever in fact." PSB#9280
Current thread:
- Re: Recent Attacks, (continued)
- Re: Recent Attacks Chris Cappuccio (Feb 19)
- RE: Recent Attacks Staggs, Michael (Feb 17)
- Re: Recent Attacks Barney Wolff (Feb 17)
- Re: Recent Attacks Don Kendrick (Feb 19)
- RE: Recent Attacks Staggs, Michael (Feb 19)
- Re: Recent Attacks Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 19)
- Re: Recent Attacks Transistor Sister (Feb 19)
- Recent Attacks andrew . c . howard (Feb 19)
- Re: Recent Attacks Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 20)
- Re: Recent Attacks Ryan Russell (Feb 19)
- Re: Recent Attacks Paul D. Robertson (Feb 21)
- Re: Recent Attacks Ryan Russell (Feb 21)
- Re: Recent Attacks Crispin Cowan (Feb 21)
- Re: Recent Attacks Ryan Russell (Feb 19)
- RE: Recent Attacks Joseph Judge (Feb 21)
- Re: Recent Attacks Randy B. Samos (Feb 21)
- Re: Recent Attacks Barrett G. Lyon (Feb 23)
- Re: Recent Attacks Transistor Sister (Feb 21)
- Re: Recent Attacks ark (Feb 21)
- Re: Recent Attacks ark (Feb 21)
- Re: Recent Attacks daN. (Feb 24)
- Re: Recent Attacks David LeBlanc (Feb 23)