Firewall Wizards mailing list archives

Re: Recent Attacks


From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts () clark net>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 09:49:13 -0500 (EST)

On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Ryan Russell wrote:

And E-trade, where *timing* matters a lot to their customers?

            --Steve Bellovin

For E-trade, it makes a lot more sense that business would be lost that
would happen then and only then (well, mostly... I'm sure some folks will
still sell even after the stock dropped below what they meant to sell at.)

But then the damages aren't just to E*Trade, they're to their customers
too.  Even if they still sell, they've lost real money.

It makes sense to punish the attacker exta on behalf of the customers of
E-trade *IFF* E-Trade does something along those lines for normal outages.

Why the if?  The law shouldn't care about "normal" policy, it should care
about the results of the illegal action.

(I think they've had some, and I don't think they did anything for the
customers, did they?  Hmm..lesse, our click-wrap agreement says "Screw
You.")

Irrelevent under the law as I understand it (which isn't all that well I
suppose.)

All I want is for prosecutors, judges, and law enforcement to put some
intelligent thought into what the damages really were.  I still say the
attacker couldn't have done 1.2B in damages, and that's the "crucifixtion"
dollar amount.   

Bad market day, people trying to get out of positions at pre-set ammounts
or as soon as possible - yeah, 1.2B isn't that difficult to reach in those
conditions.

If someone decides that mapping out the Internet to produce nice-looking
graphs constitutes a criminal port-scanning attack, you would want to have
someone force the prosecutors to name reasonable damages, right?  You

(You're picking on the wrong one.)

Paul
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Robertson      "My statements in this message are personal opinions
proberts () clark net      which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
                                                                     PSB#9280



Current thread: