Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: monitoring remote access
From: Randy Grimshaw <rgrimsha () mailbox syr edu>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 08:52:34 -0500 (EST)
This raises the question of how many man hours will be spent by company personnel responding to the court order for 'relevant' logs -- while not making 'irrelevant' 'company secrets' public? <><Randall Grimshaw, Network Programmer, Syracuse University, 315-443-5779 On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Robert Driscoll wrote:
and the fact that everyone goes through a firewall and all that activity is logged is a perhaps a deterrant. Recently an executive at a well known Internet company in Seattle was arrested by the FBI for 'minor luring'. Although he is facing charges I don't believe the company has any liability.
Current thread:
- monitoring remote access Daniel Djundjek (Nov 09)
- Re: monitoring remote access Carric Dooley (Nov 10)
- Re: monitoring remote access Saravana Ram (Nov 10)
- Re: monitoring remote access Jack Dingler (Nov 10)
- RE: monitoring remote access Robert Driscoll (Nov 11)
- Re: monitoring remote access Jack Dingler (Nov 11)
- RE: monitoring remote access Randy Grimshaw (Nov 14)
- RE: monitoring remote access Robert Driscoll (Nov 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: monitoring remote access sholden (Nov 10)
- RE:monitoring remote access Tom Steele (Nov 10)
- RE: monitoring remote access Jeff B Boles (Nov 10)
- RE: monitoring remote access Graham, Randy (Nov 11)
- RE: monitoring remote access Daniel Djundjek (Nov 11)
- monitoring remote access Yar Magma (Nov 11)