Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: kerberos,ipsec and application proxies
From: carson () tla org
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 09:19:35 -0400 (EDT)
"ark" == ark <ark () eltex ru> writes:
ark> I am thinking about addidng Kerberos support to fwtk. ark> Does this idea worth time to spend? Is kerberos still useful now - Well, Kerberos is most certainly still useful. I don't think fwtk is, though. The I/O loops are still broken, and there are so many bugs in the code (still there in Gauntlet, BTW) that I gave up long ago :( If you really want to produce something useful, just write the whole thing from scratch - it isn't that hard (OK, getting telnet right in non-transparent mode is hard - nigh impossible, as a matter of fact). -- Carson Gaspar -- carson () cs columbia edu carson () tla org carson () cugc org http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~carson/home.html Queen Trapped in a Butch Body
Current thread:
- kerberos,ipsec and application proxies ark (May 21)
- Re: kerberos,ipsec and application proxies carson (May 21)
- Re: kerberos,ipsec and application proxies Marcus J. Ranum (May 21)
- Re: kerberos,ipsec and application proxies Rudolf Schreiner (May 22)
- Re: kerberos,ipsec and application proxies Marcus J. Ranum (May 21)
- Re: kerberos,ipsec and application proxies carson (May 21)