Firewall Wizards mailing list archives

Re: Sybase Proxy for FireWall-1 ?


From: ark () eltex ru
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 11:06:23 +0400

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

nuqneH,

"Ryan Russell" <Ryan.Russell () sybase com> said :
 
I've seen two claims to app-level proxies for the TDS protocol.  Neither source
provided me
with any info when I requested it.

You did not request any info from me ;)
I will send you my source today. It is a bit ugly and based on reverse 
engineering but it is definitely better than Gauntlet one which is
pretty dumb.

 If memory serves, one of them was included
(or available?)
with Gauntlet.  Another couple of guys on the FreeTDS group are looking at doing
something
along those lines.  None of the ones I've heard of specifically claim to be able
to make things
read-only.  If you outlaw stored procs, and have the source for the TDS proxy,
you could
probably just limit it to select statements.  If you need stored procs, there
won't be any good
way for a proxy to know if the stored proc does updates or not.

In my understanding, Sybase keeps it's protocol specs proprietary which makes
it probably hard for a firewall vendor to do a good job.

We're about to release the specs, and open-source OpenClient.   Real Soon Now.
Seriously, we are... I think our legal department is just taking their time.

Hmm, could you just tell me some things i need to implement that?


                                     _     _  _  _  _      _  _
 {::} {::} {::}  CU in Hell          _| o |_ | | _|| |   / _||_|   |_ |_ |_
 (##) (##) (##)        /Arkan#iD    |_  o  _||_| _||_| /   _|  | o |_||_||_|
 [||] [||] [||]            Do i believe in Bible? Hell,man,i've seen one!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBN0Ji7aH/mIJW9LeBAQHipAP/aehjvP+A8s2Jjy6edaGoZ0A/AvsFUXEu
2tLVHgGx3pTlbFN3JjGjNR+7sMCZeFuDOJgSqiuAEzB+pRFV6v5vEXU+kAe3qZXC
IWONNX/J7xIqQ0PlbRH0fD55z3/HfMMnqcQdpG6+B4EGlX8+ajnH2+5oex/gtkqT
yPp3gmRm48k=
=cfPO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Current thread: