Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Reverse Proxy on DMZ
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry () piermont com>
Date: 11 Jan 1999 12:50:36 -0500
Joel Snider <joel_snider () yahoo com> writes:
I am sure that this has been discussed here before, but was unable to find any references in the archives. What are the pros and cons of using a proxy (caching) server on a DMZ segment to allow access to an internal web server? The DMZ is hanging off a segment on a firewall. The server would be used to provide extranet applications. Any comments would be greatly appreciated. Thanks...
One questions what the point of having a firewall is if you are providing access to web based applications running inside your site. A web server is almost without a doubt the easiest thing to break in to, so providing external access to a web server running on the inside sort of obviates the whole point of having a firewall in the first place. .pm
Current thread:
- Reverse Proxy on DMZ Joel Snider (Jan 10)
- Re: Reverse Proxy on DMZ Paul D. Robertson (Jan 11)
- Re: Reverse Proxy on DMZ Perry E. Metzger (Jan 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Reverse Proxy on DMZ youngk (Jan 12)
- Re: Reverse Proxy on DMZ Matt McClung, CCSA/CCSE (Jan 13)
- Re: Reverse Proxy on DMZ Perry E. Metzger (Jan 13)
- Re: Reverse Proxy on DMZ Matt McClung, CCSA/CCSE (Jan 13)
- Re: Reverse Proxy on DMZ Perry E. Metzger (Jan 13)
- Re: Reverse Proxy on DMZ John Kozubik (Jan 18)
- Re: Reverse Proxy on DMZ Amos Hayes (Jan 19)
- Re: Reverse Proxy on DMZ Roger Nebel (Jan 20)
- RE: Reverse Proxy on DMZ Andreas Haug (Jan 19)
- Re: Reverse Proxy on DMZ Amos Hayes (Jan 19)
- Re: Reverse Proxy on DMZ Matt McClung (Jan 19)
(Thread continues...)