Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Proxy 2.0 secure?
From: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy () alcatel com au>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 12:56:07 +1000 (EST)
On Mon, 29 Jun 1998 14:18:43 -0400, Brian Steele <steele_b () spiceisle com> wrote:
Is such a thing as an "OS-independent" logon validation mechanism?
Kerberos, SESAME (a similar European product), SSH (I'm not sure if servers currently exist for non-Unix platforms, but there's no reason why an SSH server couldn't run on NT). Therer are probably others. Peter -- Peter Jeremy (VK2PJ) peter.jeremy () alcatel com au Alcatel Australia Limited 41 Mandible St Phone: +61 2 9690 5019 ALEXANDRIA NSW 2015 Fax: +61 2 9690 5247
Current thread:
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure?, (continued)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? Brian Steele (Jun 29)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? NetSurfer (Jun 30)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? John McDermott (Jun 29)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? Brian Steele (Jun 29)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? ark (Jun 29)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? ark (Jun 29)
- RE: Proxy 2.0 secure? Choi, Byoung (Jun 29)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? Brian Steele (Jun 29)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? Ryan Russell (Jun 29)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? tqbf (Jun 29)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? Peter Jeremy (Jun 30)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? tqbf (Jun 30)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? ark (Jun 30)
- RE: Proxy 2.0 secure? Safier, Adam (GEIS) (Jun 30)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? Brian Steele (Jun 29)