Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Proxy 2.0 secure?
From: ark () eltex ru
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 21:44:57 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- nuqneH, "Brian Steele" <steele_b () spiceisle com> said :
Try reassigning IP addresses to 200 PCs. Or 2000. Remember, each PC at least on my LAN MUST have a registered name, they are not referenced byIPaddress, so your DNS config has to be updated as well.It's going to take you a LOT longer than two minutes to do that, starting with writing that Perl script.
Not so long ;).. i bet i can do in 2 minutes ;)
Ok, i was incorrect. It will fail in heterogenous world, _except_ things that do have MS-aware hooks on it. I think it's better don't rely on MS hooks and just to use standard technologies.
Define "standard technologies" as regards to OS logon validation. Doesn't everyone has their own standards concerning security mechanisms and their implementation?
I'd prefer to see something OS-independant.
NT provides a mechanism that allows you to logon to a domain of servers and PCs, and not just one server at a time. Why shouldn't I take advantage of this?
a) just because you can't rely on security of PC you try to use for network access. b) because it works only if _every_ machine in your network can speak M$ that is not always possible. If you _can_ rely on any PC security and _every_ machine on the net speaks M$.. then security issues with M$ proxy itself start to appear ;) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ {::} {::} {::} CU in Hell _| o |_ | | _|| | / _||_| |_ |_ |_ (##) (##) (##) /Arkan#iD |_ o _||_| _||_| / _| | o |_||_||_| [||] [||] [||] Do i believe in Bible? Hell,man,i've seen one! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBNZgK2KH/mIJW9LeBAQFnagP/VQ7veSyzEEWXABUoPn5gcA6auQwY+JLj yolmbvpX3VPxLettQdqExlFxII9kXK8IcooV4aBPl6+KSNtXlzc9MAZUh4oNL39e bD79FrI7aGY6mNFMECt2glleUjwv8c0+FE08JCNVFuoJaSIyebB3wi2A5wx12KL9 c3nMxLxQLEs= =YE8c -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure?, (continued)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? Brian Steele (Jun 26)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? Brian Steele (Jun 28)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? Rodney van den Oever (Jun 29)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? Brian Steele (Jun 29)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? ark (Jun 29)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? John McDermott (Jun 29)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? Brian Steele (Jun 29)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? NetSurfer (Jun 30)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? John McDermott (Jun 29)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? Brian Steele (Jun 29)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? ark (Jun 29)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? ark (Jun 29)
- RE: Proxy 2.0 secure? Choi, Byoung (Jun 29)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? Brian Steele (Jun 29)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? Ryan Russell (Jun 29)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? tqbf (Jun 29)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? Peter Jeremy (Jun 30)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? tqbf (Jun 30)
- Re: Proxy 2.0 secure? ark (Jun 30)
- RE: Proxy 2.0 secure? Safier, Adam (GEIS) (Jun 30)