Re: Proxy 2.0 secure?

["Gillian Steele" <gillian () spiceisle com>]

> Overall, the point is well taken, tho.  Scanners are useful tools, but they
> need to be used appropriately.

So, in your opinion, is the NT-based Firewall test that was performed by
Data Communications flawed?  Did they use your software inappropriately?

If the test was flawed, what would you recommend as a procedure for testing
NT-based Firewall systems for security problems inherent to the software/OS?

Regards,
Brian Steele