Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Ports and privileges
From: "James W. Abendschan" <jwa () jammed com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 01:17:28 -0800 (PST)
On Wed, 25 Feb 1998 tqbf () secnet com wrote:
All chroot-within-chroot attempts are logged with a rather high priority, as it indicates likely intruder activity on the firewall.There are legitimate reasons to want to do multiple chroot()'s;
Not on my boxes :-) James -- James W. Abendschan http://www.jammed.com "'I think it looks like an anti-cyclone,' said Merlyn." -- T.H. White
Current thread:
- Ports and privileges Chris Pugrud (Feb 20)
- Re: Ports and privileges James W. Abendschan (Feb 24)
- Re: Ports and privileges tqbf (Feb 25)
- Re: Ports and privileges James W. Abendschan (Feb 25)
- Re: Ports and privileges tqbf (Feb 25)
- Re: Ports and privileges Bernhard Schneck (Feb 27)
- Re: Ports and privileges tqbf (Feb 28)
- Re: Ports and privileges James W. Abendschan (Feb 27)
- Re: Ports and privileges tqbf (Feb 25)
- Re: Ports and privileges James W. Abendschan (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Ports and privileges tqbf (Feb 21)
- Re: Ports and privileges Darren Reed (Feb 21)
- Re: Ports and privileges tqbf (Feb 21)
- Re: Ports and privileges Vinci Chou (Feb 24)
- Re: Ports and privileges Bret McDanel (Feb 25)
- Re: Ports and privileges tqbf (Feb 27)
- Re: Ports and privileges Doug Hughes (Feb 27)
- Re: Ports and privileges Joseph S. D. Yao (Feb 27)
- Re: Ports and privileges Darren Reed (Feb 21)
- Re: Ports and privileges tqbf (Feb 24)