Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Wingate?
From: ark () mpak convey ru (-= ArkanoiD =-)
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 14:52:32 RST
nuqneH, In message <Pine.LNX.3.96.971210110650.344H-100000 () bunuel tii matav hu> "Magossa'nyi A'rpa'd" writes: [dd]
a) security=20Security on a NT box? You should be kidding. Once more: NT IS NOT MATURE ENOUGH. DOT.
[dd]
If you want a cheap entry level firewall, pick sf1 or fwtk and your favouri= te free OS.
Sure i _know_ what to do to build entry level firewall ;) And i _know_ that NT security is oxymoron. The problem is not here. I have to _explain_ that to Windoze weenies who say "i have a machine with Wingate and no dangerous services like Netbios or IIS running. Why should i think that my network is not secured properly? Denial of service? I don't care, my network is small, i'll just reboot the thing" So does anybody know anything about _known_ Wingate security problems? -- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Must be a visit from the dead.. _| o |_ | | _|| | / _||_| |_ |_ |_ CU in Hell .......... Arkan#iD |_ o _||_| _||_| / _| | o |_||_||_|
Current thread:
- Wingate? -= ArkanoiD =- (Dec 08)
- Re: Wingate? Magossa'nyi A'rpa'd (Dec 11)
- SAP ITS Arjo Mukherjee (Dec 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Wingate? Leonid S Knyshov (Dec 08)
- RE: Wingate? James Strompolis (Dec 08)
- Re: Wingate? -= ArkanoiD =- (Dec 11)
- RE: Wingate? James Strompolis (Dec 11)
- RE: Wingate? H. Morrow Long (Dec 11)
- RE: Wingate? James Strompolis (Dec 12)
- Re: Wingate? Magossa'nyi A'rpa'd (Dec 11)