Re: Apple v the FBI - one technical perspective

[Kevin McCormick <KE-Mccormick () WIU EDU>]

On March 1st, 2016 at 1:00 PM EST will be the House Judiciary Committee 
hearing on Encryption with FBI Director & Apple VP will be on C-SPAN3.

The hearing is scheduled for 3 hours.

http://www.c-span.org/schedule/?channel=3

Kevin McCormick
Western Illinois Univeristy




On 2/26/2016 4:10 PM, Barton, Robert W. wrote:
> Evening,
>
> The "one-device-only" comment I have been hear is not correct.  There 
> are at least 9 devices that the DOJ has in the queue for the same 
> reasons.  Then stack that with Manhattan’s DA, which has another 175 
> in the queue.  This is how things snowball.
>
> Robert W. Barton
>
> Director of Information Security
>
> Lewis University
>
> One University Parkway
>
> Romeoville, IL  60446-2200
>
> 815-836-5663
>
> *From:*The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv 
> [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] *On Behalf Of *Dan Updegrove
> *Sent:* Friday, February 26, 2016 11:53 AM
> *To:* SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
> *Subject:* [SECURITY] Apple v the FBI - one technical perspective
>
> Colleagues,
>
> Jeff Schiller, data / network security expert from MIT, just posted 
> this short and lucid critique of the FBI's request for Apple to 
> provide a "one-device-only" backdoor in the San Bernardino case.
>
> http://jis.qyv.name/home/pages/20160226
>
> Jeff's post references a lengthy paper written last year by a who's 
> who of security experts," Keys under doormats: mandating insecurity by 
> requiring government access to all data and communications."
>
> http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/97690/MIT-CSAIL-TR-2015-026.pdf
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Dan Updegrove
> Consultant on IT in Higher Education
>
> 4121 Threadgill St
> Austin, TX 78723
> (512) 423-7785 (cell)
>
> This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use 
> of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
> information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, 
> and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may constitute as 
> attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
> hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
> of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
> this communication in error, notify us immediately by telephone at 
> (815)-836-5950 and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) 
> delete this message immediately if this is an electronic 
> communication. Thank you.