Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives

Re: 2014 Omnibus Appropriations Act & NIH funding


From: "Manjak, Martin" <mmanjak () ALBANY EDU>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:36:18 +0000

Tracey,

It 404ed because the link is wrapped.

Try this: http://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20140113/CPRT-113-HPRT-RU00-h3547-hamdt2samdt_xml.pdf


Marty Manjak
ISO
University at Albany


-----Original Message-----
From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Tracy 
Beth Mitrano
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 11:25 AM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] 2014 Omnibus Appropriations Act & NIH funding

Hi Josh,

This case is interesting.  First, when I hit on the link, I get a 404 error.

More important, I cannot believe that this appropriation act would meet constitutional scrutiny.  Pornography is legal; 
obscenity and chid pornography are not.  Unless there are separate rulings related to grants or some such thing, the 
federal government is not allowed to restrict this form of "speech" via First Amendment law.  

And as a matter of policy, UPenn strikes it exactly correct for a research university especially.

If you have more information on that act, please share?  (Maybe Time Warner is blocking it! JK :-)

Tracy


On Feb 24, 2014, at 11:01 AM, Joshua Beeman <jbeeman () ISC UPENN EDU> wrote:

Hi,

I received an email recently from a grants administrator asking 
whether or not we had a filter in place to block pornography.  Her 
question was prompted by a new provision in the 2014 Omnibus 
Appropriations Act, which (as I understand it) includes NIH funding.  The provision states:

"None of the funds made available in this Act may be used to maintain 
or establish a computer network unless such network blocks the 
viewing, downloading, and exchanging of pornography."

http://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20140113/CPRT-113-HPRT-RU00-h3547-
hamdt
2samdt_xml.pdf

Penn does not block pornography at the border, because of the diverse 
nature of research at Penn, and the problems with defining pornography.
That said, local network segments/subnets may have network security 
devices (e.g., next generation firewalls, web proxy's, etc.) that can 
perform this function.

Is anyone aware of and/or reviewing this new provision in relation to 
grants and grant applications?  If so, any thoughts, suggestions, 
comments?

Thanks, as always, for any input.

Sincerely,
Josh


--
Joshua Beeman
University Information Security Officer University of Pennsylvania / 
ISC
3401 Walnut Street, Suite 230A
215-746-7077 / jbeeman () isc upenn edu


Current thread: