Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Bit9 - Trust Based Security - Feedback
From: "Joel L. Rosenblatt" <joel () COLUMBIA EDU>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:49:24 -0400
Hi, We use a whitelisting product called Savant from http://www.savantprotection.com I like it better than Bit9, especially in a .edu environment My 2 cents, Joel Rosenblatt Joel Rosenblatt, Director Network & Computer Security Columbia Information Security Office (CISO) Columbia University, 612 W 115th Street, NY, NY 10025 / 212 854 3033 http://www.columbia.edu/~joel Public PGP key http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x90BD740BCC7326C3 On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Greg Schmalhofer <Greg.Schmalhofer () millersville edu> wrote:
Does anyone have experience with the security software/platform Bit9? It has a different type of approach to security – to permit only known trusted software to run on your systems as opposed to attempting to block software that matches to known “bad” signatures or is otherwise identified as “bad”. I would be glad to hear any experience you have with Bit9, especially with the software installed on servers. Also, would be glad for any info/feedback on any other similar products too. Thanks for any feedback you can provide. Thanks, Greg Greg Schmalhofer Information Security Coordinator Millersville University
Current thread:
- Bit9 - Trust Based Security - Feedback Greg Schmalhofer (Jul 16)
- Re: Bit9 - Trust Based Security - Feedback Joel L. Rosenblatt (Jul 16)
- Bit9 and other whitelisting history Gene Spafford (Jul 16)
- Re: Bit9 - Trust Based Security - Feedback Hudson, Edward (Jul 16)
- Re: Bit9 - Trust Based Security - Feedback Mike Osterman (Jul 16)
- Re: Bit9 - Trust Based Security - Feedback Joel L. Rosenblatt (Jul 16)
- Re: Bit9 - Trust Based Security - Feedback Rich Graves (Jul 16)
- Re: Bit9 - Trust Based Security - Feedback Mike Osterman (Jul 16)
- Re: Bit9 - Trust Based Security - Feedback Joel L. Rosenblatt (Jul 16)