Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives

Re: 802.1X for wired ports


From: "James R. Pardonek" <pardonjr () CALUMET PURDUE EDU>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 08:13:42 -0500

We are an Enterasys shop.  We use their NAC product which ties into RADIUS and 
also keeps a database of who logged in, the switch, the port, the MAC address, 
IP address, the date and time.



Jim



James R. Pardonek, CISSP

Senior Network Administrator

Purdue University Calumet Data Network

Information Services

Purdue University Calumet

Hammond, Indiana



From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Daniel Bennett
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 6:53 AM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] 802.1X for wired ports



James,



What technology do you utilize for the captive portal?



Daniel Bennett

IT Security Analyst

Pennsylvania College of Technology

P:570.329.4989

E:dbennett () pct edu







From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of James R. Pardonek
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 7:18 AM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] 802.1X for wired ports



We use a captive portal that relies on radius to make sure that the individual 
is a student or staff. We require accounts for all who use our network. Those 
with no affiliation to Purdue require a sponsor. The sponsor is required to 
submit a form that contains the users information along with duration of use. 
We then create temporary credentials for that person. Our captive portal 
records the MAC address of the users computer along with the IP in case we 
have an issue.

James Pardonek CISSP
Senior Network Administrator
Purdue University Calumet

  _____

From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv 
<SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU>
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU <SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU>
Sent: Wed Jun 16 15:18:24 2010
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] 802.1X for wired ports



On 16/06/2010, at 3:57 AM, David Gillett wrote:



  I believe 802.1X is a good solution for "inside" ports, but for "public 
access" ports a captive portal may be a better option -- redirects browser 
requests to a login -page and blocks other traffic until login succeeds).  We 
initially used BlueSocket for our wireless authentication, and it could easily 
be deployed this way.....



David Gillett



  _____

From: Entwistle, Bruce [mailto:Bruce_Entwistle () REDLANDS EDU]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 17:21
To: SECURITY () listserv educause edu
Subject: [SECURITY] 802.1X for wired ports

We are currently looking for a method to secure wired ports located in 
locations accessible by the general public.  The network devices to which 
these ports are connected are Cisco 3750 switches.  I have tested port based 
authentication however I ran into the problem of not having the required 
supplicant installed.  We are trying to avoid having to do configuration on 
the client(student) machines.  I was looking to find out what others have done 
to prevent users outside the organization from simply connecting their 
computer through use of a patch cable and surfing the Internet.



Thank you

Bruce Entwistle

Network Manager

University of Redlands





Attachment: smime.p7s
Description:


Current thread: