Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: HITECH Breach Notifications - NIST Required or Safe Harbor?
From: "Plesco, Todd" <tplesco () CHAPMAN EDU>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:25:34 -0700
Hi Chris, asking the same question is whether compliance with the encryption standards in the HIPAA security rule equates with compliance under HITECH. To answer the first problem/consideration: Encryption standards in HIPAA security are based on your risk assessments and findings/agreements internally of whether the "addressable" encryption becomes "required". You should encrypt the electronic storage of PHI to the measure of "reasonably anticipated" and determine with the key stakeholders which functionality is "required". I also believe that a budgetary restraint may also be equated into the "risk" to your organization. To my knowledge, DHHS OCR has not gone around (yet) handing out fines across the board proactively. They have mostly responded to complaints of gross misconduct or breach fielded to them but customer end (Medicare/Medicaid) stakeholders. The second problem: Compliance under HITECH. Some opinions are that it is a loaded political question which actually undermines the intent of HIPAA as a privacy law. HITECH is seeking to encourage private practices into sharing an electronic repository on the federal side. This could turn into a powder keg for Constitutional discussions. For Federal healthcare entities though, it makes the distinction a bit clearer on "where" to store EHRs. It doesn't necessarily translate directly over to the non-Federal medical arena, though. Todd A. Plesco CISM, CBCP Chapman University, Director of Information Security One University Drive, Orange, CA 92866 Phone: (714) 744-7979/Fax: (714) 744-7041 From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Chris Kidd Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 9:13 AM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: [SECURITY] HITECH Breach Notifications - NIST Required or Safe Harbor? A question about the HITECH encryption standard for the breach notification requirements: Do you view NIST/FIPS standards/certifications as a requirement to meet the HITECH encryption requirements or is NIST just a safe harbor, and other similar technological standards would also meet with the HITECH standards? Another way of asking the same question is whether compliance with the encryption standards in the HIPAA security rule equates with compliance under HITECH. We have looked at the guidance on this and it's hard to tell if NIST is the only relevant standard or just a safe harbor. Thanks, Chris Kidd Chris Kidd 650 Komas Drive, Suite 102 Salt Lake City, UT 84108 Office: 801.587.9241 Cell: 801.747.9028 chris.kidd () utah edu http://www.secureit.utah.edu
Current thread:
- HITECH Breach Notifications - NIST Required or Safe Harbor? Chris Kidd (Sep 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: HITECH Breach Notifications - NIST Required or Safe Harbor? Jones, Dan (Sep 15)
- Re: HITECH Breach Notifications - NIST Required or Safe Harbor? St Clair, Jim (Sep 15)
- Re: HITECH Breach Notifications - NIST Required or Safe Harbor? Plesco, Todd (Sep 15)
- Re: HITECH Breach Notifications - NIST Required or Safe Harbor? Doug Markiewicz (Sep 15)
- Re: HITECH Breach Notifications - NIST Required or Safe Harbor? Jones, Dan (Sep 15)
- Re: HITECH Breach Notifications - NIST Required or Safe Harbor? Faith Mcgrath (Sep 15)
- Re: HITECH Breach Notifications - NIST Required or Safe Harbor? Plesco, Todd (Sep 15)