Re: Packet shaping and Bandwidth Management

["Bradley, Stephen W. Mr." <bradlesw () MUOHIO EDU>]

Having experience with NetEnforcer in my previous job and having seen the Packeteer in operation I liked the NE better. 
 It had a good looking interface to manage it.  It seemed like the management interface of the Packeteer was an 
afterthought.

The NEs worked well for the five years I used them and I still have a friend who uses one of their 45Mbit models.

steve

Stephen W. Bradley GCIH CISSP SSCP
Network Security Specialist
Miami University
Security Engineering
513-529-8129
bradlesw () muohio edu

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
http://www.fairtax.org

-----Original Message-----
From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Jeff Kell
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 9:52 AM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Packet shaping and Bandwidth Management

Russ Leathe wrote:
> Gordon College switched from Packeteer to netEQ a while ago.    It
> works flawlessly and our daily management of bandwidth decreased
> significantly.

While we're on the subject, and this makes two NetEQ mentions, are there
any kudos or curses for Allot's NetEnforcer vs Packeteer?

Jeff