Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: POLICY ALERT: College and University CALEA Exemption Rests on Private Network Status
From: "George C. Russ" <george.russ () CITADEL EDU>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:15:42 -0400
Private networks: http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/EPO0654.pdf The FCC's order also strongly suggests that interconnected networks will be considered private when made available only to limited constituencies, rather than to the general public. Thus, campus networks that offer Internet connectivity but are made available only to students, faculty, and administrators-and that exclude the public at large, for example by requiring university ID cards to gain access to networked terminals and by requiring password authentication on wireless networks, among other measures-almost certainly would be considered private. Many institutions provide some degree of network access-including access to the Internet-to members of the local community or the public at large (for example, at a computer terminal within a library or student center). While offering such access may serve other goals, it will significantly increase the risk that the campus network would be deemed "public" and thus subject to CALEA. It is possible that limited or incidental use by the public would not undermine the overall characterization of a network as private, particularly if the institution maintains a policy confining public access to a small number of network access points and allows it only during limited hours. Because the limits on qualifying as a private network operator have yet to be clarified or tested, however, institutions that seek to avoid any obligations under CALEA should adopt policies that prohibit public access to campus networks. http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/EPO0628.pdf FCC's clarification in the court brief is that only gateway equipment is subject to CALEA. George -------------------------------------------------------------- ITS/Network Operations and Security The Citadel Charleston SC 29409 -------------------------------------------- The Citadel: Achieving excellence in the education of principled leaders -----Original Message----- From: Valdis Kletnieks [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks () VT EDU] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 4:40 PM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: Re: [SECURITY] POLICY ALERT: College and University CALEA Exemption Rests on Private Network Status On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:08:48 CDT, Alan Amesbury said:
I'm sure many/most of us have to service. (Yes, I'll say it: What of NAT? Does each Linksys WRT54G now need CALEA hooks?)
You're not the only one to say it. You way wish to grab a baseball bat or lead pipe or something, and smash that camel across the nose while its nostrils are still outside the tent. If you want to *really* worry, consider the proposed legislation that would eliminate essentially *all* judicial review of wiretapping by the Federal executive branch: http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_07.php#004824 For the draft of the Specter bill: http://www.eff.org/Privacy/Surveillance/NSA/specter_draftbill_071306.pdf Thank you Arlen Specter.
Current thread:
- POLICY ALERT: College and University CALEA Exemption Rests on Private Network Status Rodney Petersen (Jul 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: POLICY ALERT: College and University CALEA Exemption Rests on Private Network Status David L. Wasley (Jul 13)
- Re: POLICY ALERT: College and University CALEA Exemption Rests on Private Network Status Jeffrey I. Schiller (Jul 13)
- Re: POLICY ALERT: College and University CALEA Exemption Rests on Private Network Status Alan Amesbury (Jul 14)
- Re: POLICY ALERT: College and University CALEA Exemption Rests on Private Network Status Valdis Kletnieks (Jul 14)
- Re: POLICY ALERT: College and University CALEA Exemption Rests on Private Network Status George C. Russ (Jul 14)