Re: Friday afternoon RAND fail. :>

[Travis Carelock <leddown () yahoo com>]

I actually kind of agree with him.  I don't think that he writes this with the "Lions" that are on this list in mind.  
He also makes the mistake of using the word "hacker" here.  But of the attackers out there in the world, the vast 
majority do use tools and techniques that they themselves did not come up with.   If he does mean to say that the true 
Hackers don't have the goods... well then.... there is only so much you can teach people.  

-t

--- On Fri, 10/23/09, dave <dave () immunityinc com> wrote:

From: dave <dave () immunityinc com>
Subject: [Dailydave] Friday afternoon RAND fail. :>
To: dailydave () lists immunityinc com
Date: Friday, October 23, 2009, 3:42 PM

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- From Rand's new whitepaper on Cyberwarfare (pg. 73):

http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2009/RAND_MG877.pdf

"""
      The following hints may be indicative. Private hackers are more
likely to use techniques that have been circulating throughout the
hacker community. While it is not impossible that they have managed
to generate a novel exploit to take advantage of a hitherto unknown
vulnerability, they are unlikely to have more than one.
"""

- -dave
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkriFVMACgkQtehAhL0ghep2VQCggLX5e9C4Rs4fTl+3MUBphoEp
YW0AoIeP7gtzu9VHw4YaZ9iQQviEgyVB
=LWRX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave

_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave