Re: Uninformed Journal Release Announcement: Volume 8

["Johan Johansson" <johan2sson () gmail com>]

On 9/19/07, JFV <jv274 () cl cam ac uk> wrote:
> Johan Johansson a écrit :
> > I'm sure the Uninformed Staff would have considered your article for
> > publication, had you bothered to send one to them.
> This is not the point
[cut and paste]
> "Ohhhh skape, thats incredible, you've done it again, congrats !"

Actually it is exactly the point. The point is not that what he's done
is new, fantastic or even useful (or not). Hell, I haven't even read
the article yet. What counts is that he bothered to write the article
and have it published. That's a lot more useful than you curing cancer
and not telling anyone.

> So the articles are not made for being read and criticized ?
> They are written for what then ? I have freedom to express
> myself and I usually enjoy sending good feedback to *great*
> articles, wherever they are published.

Yes, of course they are. But criticizing its publication rather than
its content seems counterproductive.

I'm looking forward to your article in the next issue whether its
brilliant or pointless.

j
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave