Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: How is this WPAD redirect even a "hack"?
From: Steve Shockley <steve.shockley () shockley net>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:38:04 -0400
george_ou () lanarchitect net wrote:
WINS and its flat address space should have been banished long ago. I haven’t used it since going to native mode on Exchange 2000 and Active Directory.
Exchange 2003 still requires WINS. From http://support.microsoft.com/kb/837391: Microsoft recommends that Exchange organizations use Windows Internet Name Service (WINS) and DNS for name resolution. Installations of Exchange 2003 and Exchange 2000 in large and subnetted organizations without WINS have not been fully tested. In large organizations, NetBIOS name resolution through broadcasts may not function correctly. Some Exchange functionality may also be affected. (The article then goes into what's affected, trivial stuff like setup on clusters, ExMerge, changing passwords through OWA and running ESM.) I'm not sure about Exchange 2007. _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- How is this WPAD redirect even a "hack"? George Ou (Mar 27)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: How is this WPAD redirect even a "hack"? James (njan) Eaton-Lee (Mar 27)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: How is this WPAD redirect even a "hack"? Ronald L. Rosson Jr. (Mar 27)
- Re: How is this WPAD redirect even a "hack"? James (njan) Eaton-Lee (Mar 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: How is this WPAD redirect even a "hack"? James (njan) Eaton-Lee (Mar 27)
- Re: How is this WPAD redirect even a "hack"? McGean, Joseph (Mar 27)
- Re: How is this WPAD redirect even a "hack"? george_ou (Mar 28)
- Re: How is this WPAD redirect even a "hack"? Steve Shockley (Mar 31)