Dailydave mailing list archives
RE: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode
From: "Paul Melson" <pmelson () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 09:44:01 -0400
-----Original Message-----
Man - that was a great Archie Bunker impression. I assume you were just
trying to be funny right? The world did > change:
1. Lynn is out of a job
Apparently willingly, and probably not for long. See: http://www.boingboing.net/2005/07/29/michael_lynns_contro.html (under 'Update 2:')
2. Cisco is going to take security vulnerabilities a bit more seriously
Just don't pass out while holding your breath for this one.
3. Security Researchers are going to treat Cisco like crap for a bit
As opposed to when Cisco had good working relationships with external security researchers? Or when Cisco would fix and publish notices for vulnerabilities that weren't made public elsewhere first and not hide behind NDA's or partner contracts? When exactly was that, again? (To be fair, Cisco neither invented nor has a monopoly on 'the ostrich syndrome.' But they are clearly infected.)
4. BlackHat attendance is going to go WAY up next year (look for more
press coverage for sure) This is probably true. Americans love to watch scandal and self-destruction, myself included. I wonder if anybody would be talking about Lynn's presentation if there hadn't been a scandal?
5. <insert next step> 6. Profit!
Mmm-hmm. s/scandal/publicity\ stunt/g PaulM _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com https://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode, (continued)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode security curmudgeon (Jul 29)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode Holden Williamson (Jul 29)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode byte_jump (Jul 29)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode Holden Williamson (Aug 01)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode byte_jump (Aug 01)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode Holden Williamson (Aug 01)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode I)ruid (Aug 02)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode Holden Williamson (Aug 02)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode I)ruid (Aug 02)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode byte_jump (Jul 29)
- RE: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode Paul Melson (Aug 01)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode Holden Williamson (Aug 01)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode TAREK (Aug 02)