RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode

["Dennis Cox" <dcox () tippingpoint com>]

Torn.
 
That about sums it up. Half a dozen reasons why he was wrong to do it - half of dozen reasons why it's sad that felt he 
had to. 
 
Was his reason truly what he stated? Was he that passionate about it? Reminds me of "The Angry Young Man" song lyrics - 
first verse. 
 
I think deep down he spent so long on it and he got something he thought was really neat he didn't want to see it 
squashed so he broke the rules of employment and presented it anyway. Then again where's the filter for this 
protection? Does anybody protect against it? That's the scary part after that story about the whole witty worm thing I 
get a nervous feeling about stuff like this.

________________________________

From: dailydave-bounces () lists immunitysec com on behalf of dan () geer org
Sent: Wed 7/27/2005 8:12 PM
To: dailydave () lists immunitysec com
Subject: [Dailydave] Lynn / Cisco shellcode




Surely someone on this list has something
to say about the Lynn / Cisco shellcode
item...

--dan


_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
https://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave


_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
https://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave