Dailydave mailing list archives
RE: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail)
From: Frank Knobbe <frank () knobbe us>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:36:46 -0500
On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 13:26, Maynor, David (ISS Atlanta) wrote:
Port knocking is just the latest stop gap for worm activity; it is not a solution or even a speedbump.
That is especially true when you consider that port-knocked services are _private_ services -- service you have to "authenticate/knock" to. It doesn't do anything at all for _public_ services like web sites, FTP sites, CVS repositories, mail servers, etc, etc. -Frank
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com http://www.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- Re: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail) David Maynor (Oct 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail) Maynor, David (ISS Atlanta) (Oct 20)
- RE: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail) Frank Knobbe (Oct 20)
- RE: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail) John Bryson (Oct 20)
- RE: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail) Frank Knobbe (Oct 20)
- Re: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail) Florian Weimer (Oct 20)
- RE: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail) Paul Wouters (Oct 20)
- RE: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail) Frank Knobbe (Oct 20)
- Re: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail) Sandino Araico Sánchez (Oct 20)
- RE: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail) Frank Knobbe (Oct 20)
- RE: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail) Paul Wouters (Oct 20)